THE INSTITUTE / LEARN
How Learn is sourced
Learn promises three things on its front page: primary sources first, disagreement shown, analysis marked. This page states what each of those means in practice, so that a reader can check whether a given entry met the standard rather than taking it on trust.
01 · Source hierarchy
Every quantitative claim in a Learn entry is traced to the most direct available source, and sources are treated in three tiers.
Tier one, primary. The agency, statute or filing that produced the number. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Census Bureau, Federal Reserve, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of Energy and Department of Defense; the United States Code and the Federal Register; company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Where a federal series is retrieved through a redistributor such as FRED, the originating agency and the series identifier are both named.
Tier two, synthesis. Work that assembles primary material under a documented method: the Congressional Research Service, the National Academies, national laboratory reports such as those from Lawrence Berkeley, peer-reviewed literature. These are cited for analysis and for data the agencies do not publish directly.
Tier three, secondary. Journalism, trade publications, consultancies and advocacy organisations. These can establish that a question exists. They are not the evidentiary basis for a figure when the underlying government dataset is available, and an entry that rests a number on tier three where tier one exists has not met the standard.
Private data sources are used where no public equivalent exists, and the entry says so. The Reshoring Initiative case database is an example: it is the only sustained American reshoring count, it is compiled from company announcements, and the entry that uses it states that limitation in the same paragraph as the figure.
02 · Definitions
Every glossary entry carries a label naming what kind of definition it is, because the four kinds carry very different authority and are otherwise indistinguishable on the page.
Statutory definitions are reproduced from the United States Code with the section cited. Language from adjacent statutory definitions is never merged into one, and where two related definitions sit near each other the entry separates them explicitly.
Regulatory definitions come from the Code of Federal Regulations, most often the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Where a regulation defines the same term differently in different parts, the entry says which parts and why they differ.
Agency definitions are the working constructs statistical agencies use to build a series. They are authoritative for that series and carry no legal force.
Economic term and industry usage mark conventions among analysts and practitioners, which have no single authority and vary in the field.
Institute framework marks a definition the Institute constructed because no adequate one existed. These are the entries a reader should scrutinise most closely, and labelling them is the point of the taxonomy.
Definitions that depend on a current federal determination carry a verification date. The critical minerals list is the case that established the requirement: it is revised at least every three years, uranium has moved on and off it twice, and an entry describing a superseded stage as current is wrong in a way that no amount of care at the time of writing prevents.
03 · Disagreement
Where two official sources give different figures for the same quantity, both appear. The entry does not choose one silently, and it does not average them.
The working test is whether the conclusion depends on the choice. Bureau of Labor Statistics publications give the 1979 manufacturing employment peak as both 19.6 million and 19.4 million; measured from either, the subsequent decline is about 35 percent, so the disagreement is a footnote and the entry says so. The Council on Environmental Quality has published both a 4.5 year average and a 2.4 year median for environmental impact statement completion; those support materially different arguments, so the disagreement is the finding rather than a footnote.
Where informed people disagree about interpretation rather than measurement, the entry states the strongest version of each position, including positions the Institute does not hold, and says what evidence would distinguish them.
04 · Marking analysis
Four annotation types appear throughout the library, and each means something specific.
Data presents a figure with its source, series identifier and period. Measurement note explains what a series does and does not capture, including seasonal adjustment, price adjustment, base year and scope. Contested sets out a live disagreement without resolving it. Institute analysis marks a conclusion the Institute has drawn rather than a finding it is reporting.
The last of these is the one that matters most. Where the Institute takes a position, the position is labelled as a position, and a reader who rejects it should still be able to use the surrounding evidence.
05 · Review and revision
Every entry carries a visible last-reviewed date. Review cadence follows how quickly the underlying material moves.
Definitions resting on a federal list or determination are reviewed at least every six months, and whenever the governing list is revised. Entries built on monthly or quarterly federal series are reviewed at least annually, and figures are refreshed when a revision changes them materially. Entries resting on statute are reviewed when the statute changes, which includes renumbering: the definition of the national technology and industrial base moved from 10 U.S.C. §2500 to §4801 effective January 2022, and most published references have not caught up.
06 · Corrections
The Institute corrects factual errors openly. A material correction is recorded at the foot of the affected entry with the date and a description of what changed and why, and the entry is not quietly edited.
A material correction is one that changes a figure, a source attribution, a statutory citation, or a conclusion. Copy edits, formatting and clarifications that leave the substance intact are not logged.
Corrections improve a reference work rather than damaging it, because a library that never records a correction is either not being checked or not admitting the results. To report an error, write to the Institute with the entry and the source you believe is correct.
07 · Series used in this library
Twelve sources supply every figure published in Learn. Each is described on the page where it appears, and the full register is available as a machine-readable file so that a reader, a newsroom or a retrieval system can check the whole set at once rather than page by page.
Download the register CSV, or read it as JSON. Provenance records may be reused with attribution. The underlying data belong to the publishing agencies.
PRIMAll Employees, Manufacturing U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · CES3000000001 (FRED: MANEMP) PRIMIndustrial Production: Manufacturing (NAICS) Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System · IPMAN PRIMValue Added by Industry: Manufacturing as a Percentage of GDP U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis · VAPGDPMA PRIMTotal Private Construction Spending: Manufacturing U.S. Census Bureau · PRMFGCONS PRIMTen-year summer peak demand growth forecast North American Electric Reliability Corporation · 2025 LTRA, published January 2026 SYNTCapacity seeking transmission interconnection Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · 2026 edition, data through end of 2025 PRIMNet import reliance for nonfuel mineral commodities U.S. Geological Survey · Mineral Commodity Summaries PRIMTime to complete an environmental impact statement Council on Environmental Quality · EIS Timelines reports, 2020 and 2025 editions PRIVManufacturing jobs announced through reshoring and FDI Reshoring Initiative · 2024 Annual Report PRIMManufacturing capacity utilization Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System · Capacity Utilization: Manufacturing PRIMDefinitions, national technology and industrial base Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives · 10 U.S.C. §4801 PRIMList of Critical Minerals U.S. Geological Survey, on behalf of the Secretary of the Interior · Final 2025 List of Critical Minerals, 90 FR 50494Corrections log
August 9, 2026 · When Did American Deindustrialization Begin?
The entry stated that the Bureau of Economic Analysis series measuring manufacturing value added as a share of GDP begins in 2005, and drew from that the conclusion that the output evidence cannot date the beginning of the decline. The 2005 start belongs to the quarterly series used in the chart. BEA publishes annual GDP-by-industry estimates for 1947 forward. The passage was rewritten to distinguish the series from the evidence base, and a measurement note on the classification break between historical vintages was added.
August 9, 2026 · What Is the U.S. Industrial Base? and Industrial base (glossary)
Both entries attached the phrase “capable of engaging in” to the statutory definition of the national technology and industrial base at 10 U.S.C. §4801(1). That language belongs to the definition of a technology and industrial base sector at §4801(4). Both entries now separate the two definitions and state the distinction.
August 9, 2026 · Critical mineral (glossary)
The entry described a 2025 executive order directing the U.S. Geological Survey to consider adding uranium to the critical minerals list, presenting a superseded procedural stage as current. Uranium was included in the final 2025 List of Critical Minerals published November 6, 2025. The entry was updated and now carries a verification date.
August 9, 2026 · Learn front page
The industrial system diagram and its caption described eight inputs while the synthesis entry described nine. The framework is now fixed at nine inputs across the library and named the Industrial Capacity Framework. The caption was also revised to state that capacity is limited by one or more binding constraints and that relieving one commonly exposes the next.